Know what your work is worth.
Págame works out what your job pays in your city, at your level, and shows you where your own pay sits against it — with the words to ask for the difference.
Free · About three minutes · Private · Built first for women
What’s happening with your pay?
Not sure yet? Any of them works. You can change your mind once you start, and your number is free either way.
Where you stand, what it means, what to ask for.
Every number Págame gives you is computed the same way for everyone, from published government wage data. Your gender is never an input. There is nowhere in Págame to even record it.
Págame’s read
Your pay sits below the modeled market range for this role and market — about $30,000 under the midpoint.
An estimate from published wage data, never a guarantee — and the starting point for what you ask for.
- Market position
- below the 25th percentile
- Confidence
- High
“I want to talk about my compensation. Based on the market for my level and the scope I’ve taken on, I’m asking for $174,500.”
Your strengths make the case; they never move your number — that comes from the data.
- “There’s no budget this cycle.”
- “Understood — then let’s agree the number now and set the date it takes effect.”
- “You’re already at the top of the range.”
- “Which range, and how was it set? I’d like to talk about the market for this work, not just my place inside one band.”
ExampleFigures across this page are one worked example, not a claim about any reader.
See how one estimate is built, step by step
- 01You reported$126,000
Your pay, in your words. Never your gender — there is nowhere to even put it.
You supplied it
- 02Market data$156,000
Median for product managers in Chicago. Your level is applied in the next step.
BLS OEWS · May 2025 estimates
- 03Págame estimates$148K–$164K
The market's middle half for your role and metro. The band itself is level-blind; your level is applied to the median in the next step.
Engine target-1.1.0
- 04Págame recommends$174,500 ask
The median lifted by your level — above the band's top, because the band is the market's middle half and she is senior. Your script never asks for less.
Your move
The same computation runs for everyone. See the bias test that runs on every deploy.
Your work changes. Your market changes. Your pay should keep up.
Most pay tools answer one question, once. The problem is that pay does not go wrong all at once — it slips, between a reorg and a title change and a year you were too busy to ask. Págame is built to be worth coming back to.
Págame does not watch your job, and will not tell you one of these has happened. You decide it is worth another look — and checking again is free, the same as the first time.
The record of where you stood, what you decided, and what happened next. Your role, level, scope and evidence stay put between visits, so coming back in November is not starting over — you change what moved, and the number follows.
You have the numbers; Rita helps you read them. She asks the questions that build your profile and explains what the result means — and she never writes a number, never asks your gender, and never predicts what your employer will say.
What Rita is, and is not →You tell Págame what you asked for and what they said. A no counts too — an employer’s answer and an economic result are two different facts, and Págame keeps them apart. Reporting it is free, and it is what makes the next woman’s number sharper.
See the whole loop — check, understand, track, act, record, return.
Employers have always known what a role pays. Workers have been asked to guess.
Pay intelligence shouldn’t belong only to employers. Págame started with pay inequity, because information about pay has never been shared evenly and women have always had less of it while more rides on every conversation. So we put it in their hands: the market, the number, and the words to use.